Some teenager drivers compete in drag races on
public streets that sometimes cause accidents, injuries and deaths.
Police officers competing in drag races with teenagers seem an unlikely
solution for this problem. Nevertheless, Vallejo California Police
announced they will compete in drag race competition with teenagers at
Infineon Raceway.
|
Uniformed
police officers drag racing in their squad cars with
teenagers send a confusing message about suitable conduct
and proper relationships. |
Organizers of Top the Cop, a San Francisco Bay
area program, claim it provides a safe, legal way for teenage drivers to
satisfy their need for speed. In addition, they claim the races allow
young people to hang out and become friends with cops. They and police
officer may mean well, but I am unconvinced those drag races produce
more positives than negatives for the community.
Other urges besides the need for speed
motivate teenage drivers to drag race on public streets. They also
express their rebelliousness. Police officers and their squad cars
symbolize societal authority. Organizers satisfy those rebellious
inclinations by naming their program "Top The Cop" and by staging drag
races between uniformed officers in their squad cars and teenagers.
Police departments should not indulge
rebellious teenagers’ fantasy to outdrive a squad car and Top the Cop.
They certainly should not suggest to other teenagers without this
rebellious nature that racing police cars is appropriate recreation.
Indulging antisocial attitudes legitimizes them. The correct response is
to stress their inappropriateness and treat the cause.
Probably they do not see it this way, but
police officers take advantage of teenagers’ vulnerability when they use
the racetrack environment to convince them they are friends. This uneven
relationship teaches young people a distorted idea of friendship where
one person has all the authority and the other only the choice to
comply.
A Vallejo Police Dept. Youth Services officer
wrote, "This event also provides the Department with an excellent
opportunity to recruit for our Police Explorer and Police Cadet Programs
as it caters to high school students, some of whom may want to pursue a
career in law enforcement after graduation." Independent thinking young
people will see thorough this pretense and end more cynical of police
contact.
I refused to take part in Police Athletic
League (PAL) programs when I was a teenager. I did not resent authority.
I played on school varsity teams. Like most young people, I looked at
police officers with their fancy uniforms and fast cars as glamorous.
Nevertheless, I believed they should confine their supervision to
lawbreakers and kids in reform school, now called juvenile hall.
Even my immature mind understood that
relationships with police agencies are unidirectional with them always
in control. I did not want this controlling authority mixed in my
recreation. My youthful conclusion that law enforcement had no place in
children’s recreation grew stronger as I matured and learned more about
democracy.
The National Police Athletics/Activities
Leagues, Inc. states a mission to prevent juvenile crime and violence by
providing civic, athletic, recreational and educational opportunities
and resources to PAL Chapters. This mission statement reveals a
presumption that all children are potential criminals without police
involvement. This is not a healthy foundation for young people’s
programs.
Every law enforcement controlled youth program
admits they intend the program to build better relationships with young
people. Translation: they create them mainly for law enforcement
purposes and secondarily for children’s needs. Surprisingly, few people
see the exploitive nature of this relationship. Instead, police officers
should build goodwill in the community by fair and respectful treatment
of residents during on-duty contacts.
There is a growing social trend to generalize
some children’s bad behavior to the group. This trend encourages adults
to act as children’s friends and to provide them entertainment to
prevent them from misbehaving. It is not a coincidence this trend and
its presumptions mirror law enforcement’s philosophy of controlling
children’s conduct with organized activities.
Rewarding bad conduct by approving it in a
different setting does not solve the problem and it is a partial and
temporary fix at best. Granting young artists the permission to paint
their creations on public buildings they previously defaced with graffiti
works until they cover all the walls. Then, the community has the same
artists without self-discipline who do not respect other people’s
property rights. Top The Cop drag racing may stop some public street
racers, but not those who steal cars to race, or those who spurn contact
with police authority.
The best solution for misbehaving children is
to hold them to conduct standards and accountable for their individual
acts. Their parents and the community’s goal should be to teach them
self-discipline and control over their impulses. Uniformed police
officers drag racing in their squad cars with teenagers send a
confusing message about suitable conduct and proper relationships.
Contact Kenneth Brooks at P.O. B 882,
Vallejo, CA 94590. opinion@ethicalego.com