They use the generalized racial
stereotype to justify discrimination.
Recently Major League Baseball (MLB)
celebrated Jackie Robinson day to honor the man who desegregated the
league sixty years ago as a player. It was a fitting to honor the man, but
hypocritical for the league and society. Major League Baseball used the
social idea of the generalized racial stereotype to desegregate MLB.
Jackie Robinson was the model for their generalized stereotype for Black
American baseball players.
| The rule of the generalized racial
stereotype allows anybody in the white majority to project the conduct
of one or a few Black Americans as character traits for all members of
the group. |
The rule of the generalized racial stereotype allows anybody in the white
majority to project the conduct of one or a few Black Americans as character
traits for all members of the group. Then, they can justify granting or
withholding human rights and economic opportunity based on those generalized
characteristics.
Dodger President Branch Rickey selected Robinson to sign as the first
Black American baseball player in MLB, because he showed the capacity to
absorb racial slurs without visible reaction. Rickey knew those type slurs
were coming, because another part of the generalized racial stereotype
tactic is that society only judges the character of the minority group
member during racial group interactions.
Someone might argue that we should overlook how MLB used the generalized
racial stereotype, because it led to a positive result. However, any use of
this degrading social practice is harmful. It denies an identity to members
of the Black American and other minority groups as rational humans with
individual traits. It continues the presumption that nonwhite Americans must
continuously prove their worth and right to equal economic opportunity. In
addition, it reinforces unfair standards and reliance on racial stereotypes
as permissible social policy. While the Dodgers and MLB used this tactic to
desegregate professional baseball, U.S. Armed Forces commanders used it to
continue racial segregation.
The only effective and moral way to end racial segregation is to declare
it illegal and to make equal opportunity the law of the land. It may seem
that I judge 1947 social practices with current ideas. However, President
Truman issued a 1948 executive order installing a no segregation policy of
equal opportunity in the U.S. Armed Forces.
The state of New Jersey adopted a constitution in 1947 guaranteeing equal
opportunity for all citizens against being racially or ethnically segregated
in any area. This was the same year MLB used the generalized racial
stereotype as a policy. Two years later New Jersey desegregated its schools
and its National Guard. I know this because I left a segregated school the
summer of 1950 and returned to a desegregated school that fall. It was that
simple in my school district. The New Jersey experience shows that it was
not all White Americans, but prejudiced White Americans who embraced the
policy of the generalized racial stereotype.
Many people still support the social policy of generalizing racial
stereotypes to minority groups. Affirmative action and the federal Leave No
Child Behind program grow from this idea. This idea of the generalized
racial stereotype is obvious in many of the claims people make defending the
Don Imus remark that called members of Rutgers University women basketball
team hos. The crux of their arguments is that Don Imus, any White Americans
male, can select any remark made by any group of Black American males, in
this case rappers, and indiscriminately report it as a character trait for
any of America's twenty million Black American females. They rely on the
crudest form of the generalized racial stereotype.
It gets worse. Some people claim Imus copied Black American rappers’ use
of ho, but they refuse to listen to Rap musician Snoop Dog’s explanation for
its use. They dismiss his explanation as ridiculous logic, hypocritical, and
too vulgarly expressed to have meaning. Snoop Dog explained, "[Rappers] are
not talking about no collegiate basketball girls who have made it to the
next level in education and sports. We're talking about ho's that's in the
'hood that ain't doing (blank)-, that's trying to get a (blank) for his
money. These are two separate things.”
The logic is clear to me. He says clearly that rappers call only call
those women hos in their neighborhood who accomplish nothing, but use sexual
wiles to leech money from men they care nothing about. His expression is
sexist, but no more so than American expressions with similar meanings like
whore, gold digger, tramp, and trophy-wife.
Imus defenders should quote a passage from one of Snoop Dogs’ songs that
conflict with this explanation to prove him a hypocrite, if he is one. I
suspect they are afraid to look, or refuse to admit his explanation is
sincere, because then it would they, Imus and others of us in society who
generalized “ho” as racial stereotype to all Black American females.
I’m willing to accept his explanation until facts prove him wrong, no
matter his other character traits.
Kenneth Brooks is a freelance writer and speaker. Contact him at P.O. Box
882, Vallejo, CA 94590. E-mail to: opinion@ethicalego.com.