Reports during a Vallejo Council meeting
revealed the city has not evaluated firefighters in years. This violates
the city charter that calls for annual reviews. Clearly, city officials
caved in to firefighters demands the city should not evaluate them
without first negotiating work standards. What part of the
employer/employee work relationship do city officials and firefighters
not understand?
| Public safety departments and
positions are important. Nevertheless, local and state
officials need to evaluate old ideas and old approaches to
providing this service. The current way is wasteful of money
and talent. |
The city employs firefighters to protect
residents against fires. It should decide the standard of the work it
buys for residents. Employees meet those standards or they should look
for work elsewhere. Rational workers do not expect to set their
employer’s work standard and by extension their employer’s product or
service standard. No business owners or managers would allow workers to
seize this authority if they want to remain in business.
Firefighters made safety a major issue in
their arguments against reducing staff during recent arbitration
hearings. They promoted the idea that firefighting is such dangerous
work the city must continue the current staffing levels to perform their
work safely. However, nobody can judge the safety of firefighters’ work
environment if they work without performance standards and work for
years without performance evaluations.
One expects unions would have pressured the
city to set its work standards for their members safety and certify
compliance by work evaluations. I presume the fire chief and captains
would conduct the evaluations. It seems that unions argue safety policy
only when it serves their purpose.
The unions also convinced the city to repeal
City Manager Joe Tanner’s policy against nepotism—city employees could
not supervise a relative—until further negotiations. They claimed the
nepotism policy threatens a strong tradition of family members working
for the city, even in the same department according to the Vallejo Times
Herald article. A city policy stopping this tradition that favors family
members getting city employment is a good result. Families that want a
tradition of their members employed in the same workplace should start a
family business.
Do Vallejo residents see a pattern here? Union
heads make something an issue for negotiation when the city exercises
its authority in ways they disapprove. More pointedly, the city usually
reverses the disputed policy and allows the union way to prevail until a
negotiated agreement. What a sweet, compliant relationship for unions.
The city as a local government has certain
power and authority not subject to compromise or negotiation. It should
act on this presumption that its authority is supreme in disputes with
employees unless a legal decision proves otherwise. However, Vallejo
officials surrender this presumption of authority when they yield to
unions’ demands for negotiation and when they allow unions to substitute
their suggested policy until completion of negotiations.
Public safety departments and positions are
important. Nevertheless, local and state officials need to evaluate old
ideas and old approaches to providing this service. The current way is
wasteful of money and talent.
For many years, I called the weed abatement
office, in the fire department, to report high weeds that were a fire
hazard. A response took weeks and sometimes months. One person patrolled
the city inspecting, responding to complaints, issuing violation notices
and following up. Meanwhile, firefighters in the various zones sat in
their stations doing nothing.
Fire prevention should be firefighters’
responsibility even under the current system. They should patrol their
fire zone for fire hazards and report them to the abatement officer for
administrative action. They should even record illegal dumping. This
would eliminate the city’s delay in addressing those hazards. However,
current union contracts and state law often forbid this type sensible
policy.
Cities like Vallejo need to redefine the
firefighter position. It makes no sense for them to hire people
specifically to fight fires and nothing else. The rate of fire calls
does not warrant it. Before, towns and small cities relied on volunteer
firefighters. The city needs to return to some form of this idea.
City employees could work other positions with
a firefighter endorsement that brings extra pay. They could do their
other work unless called to a fire. Some employees could be dedicated
firefighters who staff the station, maintain the equipment, and patrol
their areas for fire hazards. The city could keep EMT responders at the
station if it did not contract out for this service.
Vallejo could include residents as volunteer
firefighters in this system for evening and night duty. There might be
the option of doubling the police officers on patrol with some of them
having a firefighter endorsement to respond to fires.
Someone would have to work out the specifics
of this new approach. However, we need new ideas and change at local and
state government levels about public safety policy.
[FEEDBACK]
Contact Kenneth Brooks P.O. B 882, Vallejo, CA
94590, opinion@ethicalego.com